What's This All About Gold Again?
by Bennette Roach
The Hon. Chief Minister in London this week in a speech responding to Robin Cook's offer of a 'new partnership' with the Dependent Territories said: " Give United Kingdom Overseas Territories the right to interact with, and to receive assistance from states and international organizations without the active intermediation of Her Majesty's Government (HMG).
While the Montserrat Chief Minister is doing this, Herman Sergeant, Government Information officer puts a question to His Excellency Governor Abbott here in Montserrat in which he said, "...in the response to the question of British aid, it has been suggested that Montserrat should be able to deal with countries other than the United Kingdom in order to acquire aid...". The Governor could not have considered long before he came up with this shocking reply, which many have seen as being little different from Clare Short's outburst in last August about Montserrat seeking 'golden elephants' a statement she has not yet lived down and for which she has had to apologise.
The Governor began his reply: "First of all, I think I have to disabuse people of the notion that there are countries and international organizations lining up with pots of gold for Montserrat." This is seen in a very bad light as a reference to a Montserrat quest for gold as its people continue to hope that it will receive the kind of assistance necessary to give back to its people just the barest necessities of life.
The Governor continued, "That's simply not true. Any offers of aid for Montserrat are readily and very happily and willingly accepted by the British Government, as indeed we've had in some form from CARICOM, from the European Union. Individual donations have been sent in from countries in the region. This is all very well received and we are most grateful and appreciative for those donations."
Governor Abbott's attention was drawn to the existence of a letter (exhibed below) that said assistance had been offered to Britain and Montserrat repeatedly. He said that he is not aware of the facts described in the letter shown here.
Richard Teuten, who became head of the Montserrat Unit at DFID in London last November, while in Montserrat a short while ago, has also said that he is not aware of any offer of assistance being offered to Montserrat.
Chief Minister Brandt, contacted in London, said that when the letter was drawn to his attention, he responded by seeking to find out the areas the US Government would be willing to assist, setting out himself some areas of need. He says that he has not had a reply and suspects that the US may be taking their lead from the British.
In July last year Governor Savage had categorically denied that he had turned down offers of assistance from the US Consular in Barbados for Montserratians to relocate to the US. Now that this letter has surfaced, maybe the wrong questions were asked or the wrong statements made.
GOVERNOR DEFENDS BRITAIN'S COMMITTMENT
Besides the suggestion that there is no one waiting to give us gold, the Governor seemed to equate the British Government's obligation to Montserrat with its words of committment. After setting out several areas where the BG is spending funds, he referred to expenditures in every facet of life in Montserrat, all areas that were serviced before the volcano erupted, and claimed that they have spent over 50 million. The Governor did not refer to the many expressions of gratitude from government and people, but in answer to the suggestion that references are being made to the quality of life that British civil servants are living here, the type of vehicles they drive, that the money is not going in the right direction, and that is, toward addressing the basic needs of Montserratians, said: "You take it for granted, I guess, but it's only there because somebody's brought in generators, storage tanks, petroleum and gasoline, to make sure all these things are operating. Every single car you see on the road moving, is moving because of British aid money".
Then he concluded, almost peeved, "That is why I don't understand when people start querying the word commitment, the British Government's commitment. It simply does not make sense. Who is going to spend 51 million, organize major conferences in places like the Bahamas, London...who is going to arrange visits by somebody like the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, who is coming here on the 14th of February? Now all these things to me indicate a very, very strong commitment, and I defy anybody to question the British Government's commitment to Montserrat."
The volcano started to erupt nearly three years ago in July 1995, and although Governor Abbott said the money has already been spent, every other British spokesman carefully says, 'spent or committed." The fact does remain that it is nearly two years ago that Sir Nicholas Bonsor told us right here that they were committed to developing the north to provide a sustainable life for Montserratians. Up until last August, it was confirmed that the British plan had been to evacuate the whole of Montserrat.
Montserratians are still convinced, that regardless of the claim of commitment by the British Government their actions of delays and postponements and approval of funds, which take forever to get off the ground do not exactly inspire confidence.
Governor Abbott admitted the major problem facing the island, that of housing. He was sympathetic with the many who are overseas in conditions less than they are accustomed, but he said: "It seems to me not terribly logical to bring people back looking for very, very scarce housing when they are adequately accommodated either in Antigua or a local island or the UK, whilst we've still got over 500 people awaiting a house in the north. I think once we've addressed that problem and once we've overcome it, that is the time that we start looking to actively attract Montserratians back here. But until there is housing, proper educational facilities, good health facilities, assured employment, what is the point of bringing more people back right now?"
Comments on this problem, saying it highlights the British Government's lack of performance in carrying out their commitment which was confirmed nearly two years ago, could well be the only argument needed to satisfy Governor Abbott in backing down on his defiance
by Bennette Roach
The four-man team comprising the Hon. Chief Minister David Brandt, the Hon. Minister of Agriculture Austin Bramble, the Hon. Representative for Central Reuben Meade and Past Permanent Secretary and businessman Mr. Kenneth Cassell, spent the past week in London.
They were representing Montserrat at the Dependent Territories Association conference with the British Government to outline their ideas of Constitutional reform following the review called the Foreign Secretary of State Robin Cook a few months ago.
On Wednesday Mr. Cook, who had planned to offer the territories full British citizenship, had to hold back on his offer due to strong resistance from Home Secretary Jack Straw and Clare Short, Minister in Charge of DFID.
Instead, included in his proposal of a new partnership, he offered: "I am exploring with my colleagues the possibility of granting British citizenship to all the citizens of those dependent territories who do not already have it."
This was among five key issues which he said are believed to merit attention. These are the framework for partnership, citizenship, financial regulation, human rights and a name for the territories.
It was reported that the citizenship issue was to be the highlight of his speech to the Dependent Territory Association, but the other ministers ganged up saying that he was going too fast on matters that would affect their ministries as well, hence the delay for a "final view to Parliament."
After setting out four principles, which he said needed to be clear and explicit for the best possible foundation for a successful, modern relationship, he said: "We hope that the reforms we are proposing will be a true expression of these principles, and put in place a secure and lasting partnership, a modern contract with the Dependent Territories."
Announcing a new Ministry he said that after agreeing with Clare Short there will be a joint FCO/DFID department to handle the Dependent Territories. This is "to ensure the most effective possible delivery of aid to the Dependent Territories. It was later revealed that the person to head this would be Baroness Liz Symons.
Chief Minister David Brandt expressed 'delight' at her appointment, but said: "that unless an adequate budget is put in place to support the work of this Minister, this move may not be as beneficial as w might want."
On the issue of Financial Regulation, Mr. Cook pointed out, Part of our joint task is to promote the economic prosperity of the Dependent Territories."
He praised those territories for their enterprise and initiative in developing offshore financial services industries. "Some of you are world leaders in the field and have been financially self-supporting for many years," he said.
MONEY LAUNDERING
He followed this with a call for highest standards of regulation which are the best guarantee for financial success, and the biggest draw to investors. He continued: "The task of staying one step ahead of the money launderers is one which requires constant vigilance. We want all the dependent territories with financial sectors to put in place measures that will give them the highest standards of regulation, the strongest possible guarantees that these measures will be effective, and the structures to allow the territories themselves to make them work."
He spoke at length on the issue concluding that he will write to all the Chief Ministers in such territories, asking them to ensure that their regulatory authorities are genuinely independent, free from business or political interference. "They will allow us, and the rest of the world, to have confidence that the Dependent Territories have both the capability and will to address with these issues transparently."
HUMAN RIGHTS
Mr. Cook spoke finally on the human rights issue. "The Dependent Territories," he said, "are rightly proud of their observance of human rights. I share your pride. But there are still areas we need to look at - capital and judicial corporal punishment; and full compliance with international obligations."
Mr. Cook said further, "We need to make sure that the laws of the UK and her DTs are fully in line with the UK's international human rights obligations."
THE NEW NAME
As for the new name, he said "Dependent Territories' is the wrong name for today's territories , which are energetic, self-governing and anything but dependent...It does not chime with the principles of our partnership, or even with the notion of partnership itself. It is a phrase that implies reliance, and ignores the territories' high degree of autonomy."
The name being proposed is "British Overseas Territories". This will run into problems with the Dependent Territories Association who are proposing the name "United Kingdom Overseas Territories" (UKOT). The term 'British', they feel connotes ownership.
The whole speech on the face of it described a Labour Government willing to relinquish its domination on the territories without the direct suggestion of exchange.
BRANDT'S REPLY
Chief Minister Brandt in his reply said, "The United Kingdom is not fighting to hang on to her remaining United Kingdom Overseas Territories in a relationship of imperial dominance. Indeed the presentation of the Foreign Secretary was encouraging in its commitment to self-determination, and by implication a diminution of dominating power over Overseas Territories."
He also said, " The great challenge, as I see it, is for us to work out a relationship with the UK that will give the United Kingdom Overseas Territories more autonomy and self-determination without an immediate severance of ties...No constitution, however well worded or thought out, can ever work well if it is an imposed document. It is my view that the rights, responsibilities and privileges enjoyed by any people should accrue from the mores, folkways, values and political ethos of that group rather than from a perceived tradition or an imposed culture.
"The people whom the constitution should serve should play a decisive role in its formulation as it would impact their lives, operate in their culture and is the instrument which regulates their society. It follows therefore that under the new dispensation, no amendments should be made to any Overseas Territories constitution without the direct and active involvement of the people concerned."
Mr. Brandt spoke to the problem experienced with the way the Montserrat volcanic crisis has been handled. He repeated Mr. Cook's statement that the territories should have "first unfettered call on British Aid funds, to support their legitimate needs, and this should be an indisputable right." He said that if this had been in operation at the outset of the crisis , "we would not have the ill will and rancor that pervades the mismanagement of the crisis."
He then invited UKOTA to send a fact finding delegation to visit Montserrat to conduct an on the spot assessment of the situation.
Mr. Brandt's full speech is published herein.
"A Reasonable Offer, At Least At First Glance"
Twenty years ago, the John Osborne Government moved to introduce legislation to legalise abortion in Montserrat. The Christian Council moved quickly to discourage the government in the matter and it was there shown that we might be blackmailed into bringing certain laws into existence even though it may not be the best thing for our people.
Britain told its 'overseas territories' on Wednesday to stamp out money laundering and ensure their financial service regulators are independent. Foreign Secretary Robin Cook also said Britain was looking sympathetically and urgently at granting full British citizenship to around 160,000 citizens of its remaining 13 soon-to-be-called, 'overseas territories.' But, "There were complex issues involved in deciding the best approach," he said. Cook's statement culminated a six-month review of bilateral relations, triggered by a row with the volcano-ravaged island of Montserrat.
It is known that Cook had hoped to go all the way on the idea, but Home Secretary Jack Straw and the well known Clare Short reportedly joined forces in a pincer movement and forced him to back down.
The foreign secretary in his speech under the theme 'A New Partnership' did not actually make conditional the offer of citizenship with his requests for legislation for reform on Financial Regulation and Control and Human Rights. Instead he said as he ended his speech: "If we can together implement the reforms I have outlined, then we will have a modernised, strengthened partnership between Britain and her Overseas Territories. We will have a partnership based on mutual trust and respect. We already have a firm basis from the past, founded on centuries of shared history. Now I offer a stronger basis for our partnership for the future, as together we face a new Millenium."
Earlier in his speech he had set out four principles on which the partnership is based. "Clear and explicit principles are the best possible foundation for a successful, modern relationship," he said.
These principles are: First, the right of self-determination.
Second, for those that wish to retain the connection, the BG will not shirk its responsibilities - which create duties for both sides.
Third, within this framework Britain would like to see the DTs running their own affairs as much as possible.
Fourth -Britain should provide assistance to those of her Dependent Territories which need it, both to help them achieve economic development and to meet the needs of emergencies. He cited that they had the first call on the Development budget, as he lavished praise, saying, "the DTs have an excellent record of promoting economic development."
Mr. Cook noted that only two received budgetary aid, in both cases because of special circumstances - the volcano in Montserrat and the extreme isolation of St. Helena. "In both cases," he said, "the people of these islands show great fortitude and determination in the face of adversity. In both cases we are determined to help."
He spoke of the commitment of over 50 million since 1995 to Montserrat and announced his visit to Montserrat. "I will be going to Montserrat for myself, to talk to the people directly about their concerns." It is then difficult to understand, following that statement, why more time would not be allowed to the media to ask him those questions which Montserratians find pressing at this time.
There were no 'if you did this, we will do this' or vice versa.
It was certainly flattering how he was so complimentary of the territories saying: "You have shown an immense capacity to run your own affairs successfully and responsibly...The Dependent Territories have a record of achievement which we acknowledge and applaud," as he made mention of several of the territories' performances.
In the months to come these territories will know what all the adulation was about, and whether it was preparatory to demands such as removing homosexual laws, which may run against the culture and conscience of a particular territory, sometimes because it is accepted in the international arena. His speech was an invitation to join in a partnership of co-operation where on the surface the question as to what is in it for Britain, seems difficult to answer.
Since it is difficult not to be suspicious, we must be prepared and be wise enough to smell any later attempts at extortion. The British are well known for being excellent at diplomacy, but sometimes it is difficult not to consider it as dishonesty. That's when it seems there is a thin line between the two.
Dear Mr. Editor:
There appears to be some growing acceptance that thc sum of EC$120 per month being provided by the British should prevent one from seeking gainful employment while receiving this commendable but certainly not lavish support.
There was no proclamation that employment would be prohibited on the receipt of EC$120, or in relation to acceptance of the off-island relocation package of EC$10,000 for a period of six months overseas. The deduction of earned income from the package was also not announced as being part of the package at the time it was offered.
Further, the total support package for Montserratians at this time is not comprehensive enough to warrant that all persons receiving the so-called 'unemployment benefit' of EC$120 per month should cease and desist from engaging in gainful employment.
Before the volcanic crisis, every Montserratian had ownership or access to a place of habitation at a reasonable rate (thanks in main to Montserratians overseas who invested in properties at home). The majority of Montserratians have now lost their houses and other property and there is no indication that they will be returning to the standard of life to which they had become accustomed any time soon.
There is therefore every justification for Montserratians, through their 'own efforts, to seek to recoup from the blow which the crisis has dealt them. Their past life's work has been destroyed and their future altered to the extent that they no longer feel secure.
Having a saving has always been an important human endeavor to cater for the unknown, unexpected and to enable planning for the future. To deny a Montserratian EC$120 because he is employed is unreasonable under the circumstances. There isn't much one can save from EC$10,000 in Antigua which may become useful in the event of disruption due to a hurricane, hospitalization or other unexpected event. Even the well publicized Sustainable Development Plan cannot at this time offer the security that a saving would, nor could it provide the basic need for food, clothes and shelter.
Until HMG implements a comprehensive programme of assistance for Montserratians which addresses their short term needs and considers their anxieties about their future existence, there is no justification for deductions from earned income or denial of EC$120 which should be more properly called a 'Recovery Benefit" and not an unemployment benefit.
With respect to persons returning home to work despite having accepted the off-island relocation package, this can be interpreted to be the policy to depopulate Montserrat backfiring. It also highlights the fact that British incentives to leave the island far outweigh the incentives to stay even when it is obvious that most Montserratians preferred and still prefer to stay at home. Where there is culpability on the part of the state it would be difficult to administer a redress.
Somebody needs to get the message that the local Government and the people of Montserrat should be allowed to set their own priorities, with reliance on the British to provide the appropriate support.
A Friend Abroad
Mr. Editor
Please allow me a small space in your paper to relate an experience, which I've since heard, is common practice.
On Wednesday evening January 28, just after 7 p.m., I had occasion to take my eight (8) year old son to the casualty department of the Glendon Hospital , he was suffering from what seemed to be a very painful earache.
Having arrived at the casualty department, the nurse on duty immediately began to attend to him. My son was screaming and was obviously in excruciating pain. The nurse paged the Doctor on call who responded very quickly. During the conversation with him the nurse told him that the child seemed to be seriously ill so she thought that he should come to have a look at him. My son was still screaming at the top of his lungs and the Doctor could easily have heard him. For whatever reason, the Doctor decided not to come to the casualty department in spite of the heart-rending cries of the child and in spite of the nurse's strong recommendation that he should come . He instead proceeded to prescribe medication, so one has to assume that the illness was diagnosed over the phone. One of the medications prescribed was an eardrop.
After the phone conversation with the doctor, I asked the nurse if the Doctor was not going to come. When she told me that he was not but that he had prescribed something, I told her that the pain-killer could be administered, but that no one was going to drop anything in my child's ear unless he was seen.
I was just wondering if this Doctor understands the meaning of DOCTOR ON CALL. If his job description includes responding to calls, especially ones that the nurse considers being serious, then he should do so or else.
Having spoken to a number of persons, this apparently is just another one of many such incidents. People are afraid to complain because they fear possible neglect in the future.
I think that this matter should be looked into immediately.
I just want to openly thank the nurses who continue to work so hard under very difficult circumstances.
A Concerned Mother & Citizen
Mr. Melvin Edwards, President of the Caribbean Confederation of Credit Unions, visited with the local Credit Union on Thursday of this week.
He held discussions on the level of assistance given to the local Credit Union with Bennette Roach and Roselyn Cassell-Sealy, the President and Executive Director, respectively.
The Credit Union has received assistance from the Canadian Credit Union Movement, the Regional Credit Union and is at present exploring possibilities with the Irish Credit Union Movement.
To date the St Patrick Credit Union has received over $75,000 material assistance from the Regional Credit Union Movement and Can $100,000 from the Canadian Credit Union Movement.
Mr. Edwards ,following his discussions and observations, confirmed that he was satisfied with the distribution of the assistance from the Canadian movement to the business and agricultural sectors. He indicated that he was impressed with the continued loyalty of credit unions members to their Credit Union and again commended the Credit Union management for its innovative networking regional initiatives, which keep St Patrick's Credit Union members residing in Antigua, St Kitts, Nevis, Dominica and Grenada tied, not only to their Credit Union but also to Montserrat. He felt that this was a good model for the regional movement to follow.
The Executive Director, Mrs Cassell-Sealy, confirmed that all the funds received to date have been fully disbursed and or committed to more than 11 farmers, 20 micro businesses and 50 households. The final part of the project will be completed when the back-yard garden project for the new Davy Hill community gets underway in another week or so. The Executive Director said that she was looking forward to the "greening" of the Davy Hill community with the provision of back-yard gardens for each of the 50 homes there. At present, the Credit Union is waiting for the completion of allocation of house plots to the residents and the delivery of top soil to make the project workable.
Montserrat Christian Council (MCC), has donated two large aluminum pots to the St. Johns hospital kitchen. Program officer at the MCC, Claude Brown, says a request was made for pots to assist the staff to cook in bulk, to meet the hospital's needs. He says the pots were purchased with money made available under the MCC's emergency support fund.
Mr. Browne delivered the pots in a brief ceremony saying he hoped that the hospital staff continue to take good care of the sick. "We know at this time that we have a lot of problems because we are trying to take care of their spiritual needs and you are taking care of the physical needs, and together we hope we can build a better country."
Environmental officer Trevor Howe accepted the pots on behalf of the Ministry of Health. Mr. Howe thanked the MCC and said the pot will be used to insure that patients at the hospital are properly fed. ". This donation is really a true representation of what ought to be in these difficult times," he said.
National Geographic Films Again
It is expected that Montserrat will be featured for the third time in a National Geographic video special.
A team from the U.S.-based media organization has just concluded five days of filming on Montserrat. Executive producer Margaret McEvoy says National Geographic is producing a one-hour feature on Montserrat's experience with an active volcano. It will cover the period from 1996 to the present.
The feature, called "Volcano Island," will be shown on Superstation TBS on March 22. McEvoy, speaking to ZJB News before leaving Montserrat on Wednesday, said: "It's an incredible experience, especially to come back here and see the progression of the country through this crisis. The people have been incredibly friendly to us and very resilient. I think that is what has struck me about Montserrat, is the resilience and the hope of wanting to hold on."
Ms. McEvoy said that people have put themselves out and that has been very rewarding. She said thanking the people, " I would say that the people of Montserrat have really made this possible for us. They've been extremely helpful. I really would just like to thank the people here."
Ms. McEvoy expressed the hope that she will be able to come back here and find this a thriving country.
By Staff Correspondent
While Prime Minister Tony Blair and President Bill Clinton huddled in Washington this week about possible military action against renegade Iraq, belligerence escalated sharply among Blair's own ministers in London.
The Washington meeting was in response to Saddam Hussein's continued defiance of United Nations inspection teams' mandate to catalogue Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. In London the heightened aggression followed quickly on the heels of the meeting of chief ministers of Britain's remaining dependendent territories.
At that meeting, Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, proposed to restore British citizenship to the 160,000 people in the dependent territories, and announced that the territories will be redesignated as overseas territories, that a new department, the United Kingdom Overseas Territories ministry, will be created, and that it will be headed by Baroness Symons, Foreign Office Minister.
British journalists Ewen MacAskill and Ian Black called the fallout "the biggest political dogfight since Tony Blair became Prime Minister." The combatants, they reported, were Robin Cook, Jack Straw and Clare Short.
"Mr. Cook," MacAskill and Black reported, "infuriated both Mr. Straw, the Home Secretary, and Ms. Short, International Development Secretary, by unilaterally announcing new arrangements for the dependencies. Ms. Short is said to have gone 'ballistic'."
The British press reported that both Ms. Short and Mr. Straw were sent a draft of Mr. Cook's speech the preceding Friday and both immediately objected, Ms. Short on the grounds that the dependencies come under her department and Mr.Cook could not arbitrarily appropriate them without notice.
Mr. Straw's opposition reflects his long-standing concern about reopening the question of British citizenship, a position voiced most frequently before the British turnover of Hong Kong to China, when there were emotional forebodings that throngs of Hong Kong Chinese might claim the right to live in Britain.
How all of this is to be resolved may not be known until the British Government issues a white paper on the dependencies later in the year.
In the meantime, however, Mr. Cook's suggestion of full British citizenship to all the newly designated overseas territories does not come without a price. He expects in return the overseas territories' agreement to tough new financial legislation against drug smuggling and money laundering, and abolition of laws inconsistent with Britain's human rights standards, which prohibit execution by hanging and laws against homosexuality. A number of Chief Ministers, including Montserrat's David S. Brandt, already have dismissed the latter as inconsistent with the standards and morality of their societies.
Ms. Short's distress may seem more justifiable to less-familiar residents of dependent territories than it will to Montserratians. MacAskill and Black's describing her reaction to this new crisis as "ballistic" comes as no surprise. The Secretary for International Development is no stranger to exaggeration, nor to perceived threats to her bailiwick.
It was the increasing drain of emergency aid to Montserrat on funds that she much preferred to spend on Third World development projects to which she was personally committed that got her into trouble in the first place. She has been apologizing ever since for impatiently dismissing calls for increasing aid to Montserrat as close to asking for "golden elephants."
The uproar, both in Montserrat and Britain, occasioned by that outburst led the former British Government to send to Montserrat a visitor to re-emphasize both official and public British sympathy for all who were beset by the volcanic crisis. That visitor_who returned a second time, was Baroness Symons, now Mr. Cook's choice to head the British Overseas Territory ministry. Ms. Short cannot be insensitive to the irony in that assignment.
After hearings by the House of Commons select committee, during which Ms. Short acknowledged both her dilemma at the drain on development projects and her remorse for an intemperate remark, the committee observed that both the Foreign Office and the International Development Department were responsible for the 13 dependencies. It recommended charging them to a single department.
Under Mr. Cook's proposal, there will now be a separate ministry to oversee the territories, as the select committee recommended. The source of funds for those territories, however, apparently will continue to be Clare Short's departmental budget.
Eleven of the 13 dependent territories are populated. They are Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands, St Helena and dependencies, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, and the Turks and Caicos Islands. The other two are British Antarctic Territory and British Indian Ocean Territory
Following the departure of Mr. Frank Black a few weeks ago, the Department for International Development made the announcement on Wednesday, 4th February confirming the appointment of Mr. Douglas Houston MBE as Head of the Aid Management Office, Montserrat and DFID Office in Antigua. Mr. Houston's appointment will be for two years.
Local officials are expressing concern over the appointment since informed sources have said that the two offices here and in Antigua are to be combined. There is also concern over Mr. Houston's effectiveness since Mr. Black's departure ended any approval authority of aid funds in Montserrat.
Informed sources also suggested that with the new recommendation to move offices to the non-existent accommodation in the north that the aid office might operate out of Antigua.
Government House today announced the appointment of Mr. Rhys Burriss as Magistrate/Registrar by His Excellency the Governor, Tony Abbott. Mr. Burriss was sworn in on Wednesday, 4th February, 1998.
Following graduation from Oxford University in 1974, Mr. Burriss qualified as a Barrister of Gray's Inn in London.
Subsequently, he has worked in a variety of Magistrate's Courts in both London and in County Durham in the north of England. His last appointment was in the most senior position of Clerk to the Justices in County Durham.
Mr. Burriss states that he is hoping to serve the people of Montserrat in this difficult time by maintaining a high quality service both judicially and administratively.
The Government of Montserrat has announced a reduction in port rates. Minister of Communication and Works the Honorable Rupert Weekes says reductions are reflected in wharfage and cargo handling charges. Mr. Weekes says reduction is aimed at alleviating some of the hardships being experienced by residents on Montserrat.
Minister Weekes says, " the recommended reductions were put forward to government and we looked at them and we thought that we would like to see further reductions. In saying this, I would also like to add that the object of reducing the port charges is to make the cost of living lower for all our people. It would defeat the purpose of this exercise if we were to lower the port rates and then the reduction would not be passed on to the consumers."
The minister said the hope is that, "where we do our part as a government by lowering the charges at the port, that the merchants, the importers and all others involved would see it necessary to do their part in reducing the cost of the items as far as possible, so that the consumers would ultimately benefit from whatever reduction government has made in the port charges".
Montserrat was represented by Honourable Chief Minister and Minister of Finance Mr David S. Brandt, and Honourable Financial Secretary Mr C T John, at the 34th meeting of the ECCB Monetary Council convened in St Kitts at the ECCB headquarters on 30th January, 1998.
Upon his return the Financial Secretary reported that matters were discussed under the following headings:
Economic review and projections for 1998; Fiscal Reform Programme; Offshore Financial Services; Legal impediments to Financial and Economic development.
Mr. John reported that with respect to Montserrat's case it was the conclusion that, given small size, small population, high unit cost, narrow resource base, the destruction to the productive base, and the projection that the North will remain safe, there are important issues which require explicit policy attention. Some of these include:
(a) development of a coherent and comprehensive land use policy that would further facilitate the control and coordination of physical development;
(b) the reorientation of the fiscal regime to produce a tax system that is easy to administrate, raise a reasonable amount of revenue without being too burdensome in light of the present volcanic crisis and provide incentives that would stimulate economic activity and private sector investment, and
(c)the recapitalisation of the financial sector.
It was also concluded that economic recovery has to be led by the public sector.
Mr. John went into detail and explained that under the Fiscal Reform Programme, "one of the main objectives of the Fiscal Reform Programme is to develop fiscal regimes that are conducive to economic growth and development.
With this aim of promoting economic development, member countries of the ECCB are encouraged to generate or increase domestic savings..."
He said that public sector savings are required for:
(a) Repaying principal on debt obligations;
(b) Eliminating outstanding arrears;
(c) Financing capital items and small projects;
(d) Providing counterpart funds for externally financed projects;
(e) Accumulating reserves and to contribute to the sinking fund.
The concept of public sector savings does not apply to us at this time. But the FS said: "We need to be aware of what the other members are doing".
For us in the British dependent territories it must be with some interest to note the position taken on 'Offshore Financial Services'.
"The ECCB continues its preparation to take over the monitoring of offshore banks, while a committee of Attorneys General has been set up to advance the cause," Mr. John said, adding that the position of Anguilla and Montserrat will be considered.
The meeting noted under the Legal impediments to Financial and Economic development that in meeting the challenge of developing our economies a suitable legal frame-work must be in place. That frame-work must be dynamic, transparent and provide for speedy and effective resolution of disputes.
Some measure of harmonization of laws governing activities in the financial sector is required to facilitate the desired development. It has been found by examination, that there are twenty-two (22) areas of law in which revision is required. Examples of such areas are Intellectual Property, Contract, Standards and Consumer Protection, Insurance, Securities and Building Societies.
OTHER FINANCIAL MATTERS IMPORTANT TO MONTSERRAT
The Financial Secretary also reported that while there they discussed matters on other topics of vital importance to us.
He met with the ECCB team that is considering the Soft Mortgage scheme for Montserrat, who he said, "expressed concern with the project as now proposed by the Department for International Development (DFID) and was scheduled to do in depth analysis on 2nd February." He continued that what was made clear, "is that the project is vastly different from what was first proposed".
Meanwhile he said that the Honourable Chief Minister was able to get the ECCB to lend a more sympathetic ear to the Montserrat Building Society (MBS) problem. Details of the situation were to be sent to be studied to see if they can assist.
Jamaica's House of Representatives yesterday passed the maritime drug enforcement (shiprider) bill which allows US law officers to pursue drug traffickers in the island's territorial waters and airspace. The "shiprider" pact was arrived at early last year after often tense negotiations between Kingston and Washington. The bill now goes to the Upper House of Parliament tomorrow before becoming law.
The Government of Montserrat is seriously considering legislation which will amend the Immigration and Passport Regulations Act, (Chapter 137).
This Statutory Rules and Orders if passed in the Legislative Council will bring into law what may be called 'The Economic Residence Permit. In fact the citation reads that the Regulations may be cited as "the Immigration and Passport (Economic Residence Permit) Regulations 1998.
This law will make an Applicant, eligible for the grant of a permit of economic residence if he satisfies the Governor-in Council of his intention to make a commercial investment in Montserrat and -
(a) (i) maintains a property investment in Montserrat of at least the equivalent of ECC$400,000 or
(ii) maintains a deposit of at least the equivalent of EC$400,000 at a commercial bank operating in Montserrat; or
(iii) holds Montserrat government securities to the value of at least the equivalent of EC$400,000 Eastern Caribbean dollars; and
(b) is a fit and proper person to be granted a right to reside in Montserrat.
It is proposed that other conditions may apply and Executive Council may also impose such conditions as it thinks fit, which may cause the revocation of such a permit if the condition is not met. A condition, for example, may well be the payment of a fee.
There is also provision however, that Executive Council may, "in any case in which it deems it expedient in the national interest grant a permit to any person on such conditions as it may specify."
Dependents of a person to whom a permit has been granted will be eligible for the grant of permanent residence only if at the time of application he resides in Montserrat and is a fit and proper person to be granted a right to permanently reside here. Further a permit of permanent residence granted under the Regulation will only be valid for the period of validity of the permit of economic residence to which it relates.
Many have been expecting and hoping for such legislation, while others have their doubts about the implications.
The legislation clearly seeks to bring money into the country and to encourage those who can afford it to bring investments to the island. It does not call for any enormous sums as the total investment required to qualify would not amount to US$500,000.00.
There are other implications with such legislation coming into effect and these will be reported on later.
Observers feel that this move will be a show of confidence of the government in the future existence of Montserrat.
Day Tour Familiarization Trip to Montserrat
On Saturday, January 31, 1998, a group of 15 persons, including tour operators, travel agents and activities desk personnel from several hotels in Antigua, visited Montserrat on a familiarization tour at the invitation of the Montserrat Tourist Board.
The trip was organized as a follow-up to a recent visit to Antigua, by members of the Chamber of Commerce, tour operators, ground tour handlers and the Montserrat Tourist Board, to discuss the promotion and implementation of Day Tours to Montserrat.
The group from Antigua had an opportunity to see, first-hand, the product that Montserrat has to offer and what their clients can do while in Montserrat. This exercise will assist those persons involved in selling Day Tours to Montserrat to provide a more realistic picture and information about what is available on the island.
Although, there is still much to be done in terms of improving the current product, the visiting group felt that there is great potential for a vibrant Day Tour operation that will benefit the Montserrat economy.
Promoters note that day trippers can come to Montserrat on the early morning ferry from Antigua (departing at 6.15 am) and return on the afternoon ferry (departing at 5.30 p.m.)
What Happened at St. Patrick's
by Bennette Roach
The Montserrat Volcano Observatory (MVO) has issued the following which in part is a summary of a report covering the December 26, 1997 event that completely devastated St. Patrick's and some nearby villages in the south of the island.
"The Boxing Day Collapse, 26 December 1997"). There are three main types of deposit: debris avalanche deposits, pyroclastic flow and ash cloud deposits (including co-ignimbrite ash), and blast deposits. There is also considerable erosion of some surfaces. The relationships between different facies are not simple, but it is thought that a sector collapse occurred. This involved slippage of material from the area around Galway's Soufriere (which was probably weakened by hydrothermal activity), part of Galway's Wall and new talus and dome rock. This then triggered a large conventional dome collapse with associated pyroclastic flows and ash cloud surges, and culminated in an energetic lateral blast."
The scientists have, since the event, said that the activity was the biggest to date at the volcano. A full report based on the above should take away the fear, doubt and surprise and for some people, the shock that has become very commonplace for some. Unfortunately, not many would know and others may not remember what the whole Soufriere area looked like, when it was a place that people went and enjoyed the sulphurous scenery.
Dr. Simon Young has been quick to remind how he earned the nick-name "Tsunamis Simon". Speaking to the Reporter in December 1996, he said: "There is more pressure being built up which is pushing against the Galway's Wall...which makes a lateral explosion possible."
In the article referred to here, under a similar heading to this, referring to the Galway's Wall, I reported as follows: "Following all that has been said about the volcano and its recent development (the reported crack and possible tsunamis) particularly relating to the Galway's Mountain (wall), from what I have seen of it, the situation it presents is most precarious. I have seen landslides on that mountain and watched it erode year after year, ever since I was a little boy growing up in St. Patrick's, but be that as it may, even a strong wind now can send the top of this very brittle wall tumbling down into the Galway's Soufriere area and down White River.
What the scientists fear most of all and would like the entire island to be aware of, even neighbouring Guadeloupe, is that the tremors from the tectonic earthquakes that have been occurring at the volcano may cause the entire side of the already weakened wall or mountainside to give, causing very serious erosion of the dome and its fiery material to be exposed moving the volcano into an explosive state."
It should not be so difficult for the scientists to tell us soon enough how close they were in their discussions with me. What that will do of course, is take the surprise out of the disaster and the shock.
The scientists have already admitted that they may not have been as thorough in their description and reporting of events leading up to the disaster, no doubt satisfied that no lives were at danger, with no one known to be living in the area.
It was in that same article referred to that a volcanologist had said, "It is wrong (for scientists) to react excitingly as it is more likely to create fear in residents. Worst yet is to turn around later and say, 'these events are possible but not likely.' This erodes the confidence that is necessary for the public to have in the scientists."
THE SOLAR ECLIPSE
Is Coming Be In Montserrat February 26,1998.
Solar Eclipse Photography
Solar eclipses may be easily photographed provided that basic eye safety precautions are followed.
Almost any kind of camera with manual controls can be used to capture this rare event. However, a lens with a fairly long focal length is recommended to produce as large an image of the Sun as possible.
This is accomplished by using a stationery camera capable of making multiple exposures (check the camera instruction manual). Since the Sun moves through the sky at the rate of 15 degrees per hour, it slowly drifts through the field of view of any camera equipped with a normal focal length lens (i.e. []-35 to 50 mm).
If the camera is oriented so that the Sun drifts along the frame's diagonal, it will take over three hours for the Sun to cross the field of a 50 mm lens.
Finally, an eclipse effect that is easily captured with point-and-shoot or automatic cameras should not be overlooked. Use a kitchen sieve or colander and allow its shadow to fall on a piece of white card-board several feet away. The holes in the utensil act like pinhole camera and each one projects its own image of the Sun.
Virtually any camera can be used to photograph the phenomenon, but automatic cameras must have their flashes turned off since this would otherwise obliterate the pinhole images.
No Pots of Gold for Montserrat
by The Independent Thinker
And so spoke His Excellency, Governor of Montserrat, Mr. Anthony Abbot in response to a very simple and honest question from Government Information Officer, Herman Sergeant.
One can not help but get the impression that all British officials in any way associated with Montserrat 's rehabilitation seem to be fixated on gold, on the idea that Montserratians are fixated on gold or that Montserratians feel that the volcano was meant to bring them gold. Alternatively, maybe the Governor is related to Madame Clare Short. If he is, he really should keep that secret to himself.
But this is not the time for digression. Let's stick to the issue at hand. Let us first say respectfully to His Excellency that Montserrat is in need of his government's commitments to be translated into real projects that every Montserratian can see on the ground. Secondly, let us ask of the Governor where is the proof that the Small Business Project is actually approved. You see, Your Excellency, we all called NDF to inquire into the terms of the loans and we were all told that their guess was as good as ours was. And finally let us ask of His Excellency where is the Soft Mortgage Loan Project that has been bandied about for the last six or so months. Does His Excellency know that what Montserratians want is the opportunity to borrow money to build new homes and refinance their businesses and not seek "gold" from either him, Madame Clare Short, Her Majesty's or any other Government or international organisation?
We were a little more than miffed, Your Excellency, when Madame Clare Short accused us of wanting "golden elephants" from the British Government. But later on, because of the wonders of television, we understood why she so eloquently used the elephant analogy. We can even excuse her for labeling us greedy little natives who seem bent on dunning the British Empire. You see, it is fair to say that she has never been to this or any part of the third world and so, she has no idea that Montserratians are a proud people, who are not looking for golden handouts. Rather, what Montserratians seek are just the small doses of assistance necessary to give us a leg up. But His Excellency has been in our midst for some time now. He has had time to see some measure of our souls. He ought not to impugn that we are gold diggers. To that response, Sir, we take umbrage.
We also take issue with the latter part of his response. We know for a fact that there are other persons lined up to give us assistance. We have seen the letters from the United States Member of Congress and the Israeli Government. We have not yet seen those from France, Germany, Italy, Canada and elsewhere. We know for a fact that there have been offers of assistance to the British and Montserrat governments. We know for a fact that neither government has taken up the offer. We need to take issue with our own government, but that's for another show. Right now we are focused on Your Excellency. We would like for you to tell us how come Member of Congress Gerald B Solomon of the United States has stated offers of assistance more than once according to his own correspondence, and I quote :- "The State Department has also reiterated its standing offer of assistance on several occasions...But to date neither the Government of Montserrat nor of Great Britain has requested the aid. They apparently feel that the Government of Great Britain is able to handle the crisis on its own."
Does this, Your Excellency, have something to do with the "open secret" that the British want the islanders off the island? In fact does this feed into the wider conspiracy that involves giving the Dependent Territories British citizenship in exchange for the legalization of homosexuality?
Should we wait for a story about making Montserrat a British haven for sexual deviance, or should we start "jus wonderin'"?
As absurd as this sounds, one cannot help but wonder why on more than one occasion, we have heard it publicly proclaimed by British officials that no one wants to help Montserrat but the British. At the same time British officials and scientists either strive to frighten us to death, insult us to death, frustrate us to death or relocate us to death. And during all this they beat their chests and make their usual empty promises and claims of commitments.
With all due respect, Your Excellency, we are not about "show me the money." We are about living in our own country, retaining our Montserratian citizenship, rebuilding our own country and getting the start up capital that you and Her Majesty's Government are obliged to provide but have been promising and withholding since the start of the volcanic crisis.
from Bottom Line/Personal
. . .sit-ups are as good as abdominal machines for working midriff muscles? There is no advantage to "ab" devices unless buying them motivates the purchaser to start and stick with a fitness program. Old-fashioned bent-leg sit-ups do just as well at toning the midriff.
Williarn Whiting, PhD, assistant professor of kinesiology, California State University, Northridge, vhose study of abdominal machines was published in the Arnerican Council on Exercise's Fitness Matters.
...the 10-year risk of diabetes can double for every 10 pounds you gain over the years? As the proportion of Americans considered overweight increases, so will new cases of diabetes.
David F. Williamson, PhD, division of diabetes translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, whose study of data on more than 14,000 people was published In American Journal of Epidemiology.
...about 10% of Americans will develop a kidney stone sometime in their lives? The stones are most common in people ages 20 to 40. . .and occur more frequently in men than in women. Most stones eventually pass naturally- though often with tremendous pain. Some require surgery. Caution: Avoid "blind basketing" surgery. In it, a small basket-shaped instrument is threaded through the urethra and bladder- without imaging guidance. This procedure can cause severe complications.
Fredric Coe, MD, director of kidney disease program and professor of medicine and physiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine.
...resumes are screened by computers at a growing number of companies? Resumes do not reach human beings until they pass a scanning process that looks for specific words or phrases a company wants. Self defense: Include many nouns in your resume- especially job titles, departments and organizations. Analyze the wording in classified ads, and make sure any words emphasized in the ad are in your resume.
Job Hunting Dummies by Max Messmer, chairman and CEO, Robert Hall International, world's largest specialized staffing firm, Menlo Park, California (IDG Books/$16.99).
...merchandise in out1et stores may not be bargains? Manufacturers and designers used to sell items in outlet stores for 70 percent less than department-store prices. But these days manufacturers make items specifically for outlet stores-and discounts are not what they once were. Expect to save only 20 percent on most items at an outlet store today.
Ira Kalish, PhD, senior economist, Management Horizons, the retail consulting unit of Priice Waterhouse LLP. Los Angeles.
Family Conflicts Are Really Quite Normal
But don't have to be destructive or even disagreeable
While most people feel that family conflicts are unhealthy, they should understand that family disputes are normal...unavoidable...and important.
Conflict within the family is a necessary catalyst for individual growth. It is through conflict that we learn to define our identities and affirm our boundaries -where we end and others begin. Ideally, we emerge from conflicts with a stronger, healthier sense of ourselves.
Danger: Conflict can be damaging to self esteem, trust and growth if the family environment is unsupportive or unsafe.
Crucial to constructive conflict: Fairness. There are ways to allow everyone to reap positive rewards from the inevitable family disagreements.
STRATEGIES FOR BREAKING STALEMATES
Examples. Dad and son take a walk to settle their dispute away from the family, so neither appears to "back down." Mom flips a coin so fate decides "who goes first"
Show that you are trustworthy, trusting and forgiving. Resist the temptation to have the last word or take a final shot after a cease-fire.
KEY TO SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATION
To help solve problems...
Example: The kids want to have a party at home, but the parents don't want to deal with the mess. What if the party is held at a skating rink?
Expand the pie, if feasible, to allow everyone to get what he/she wants.
Example: Both kids want to wear the same hat Get a second hat
Share resources. That way, everyone gets some of what he wants.
Example: Parents and their teenager need the car. Parents agree to drop off the teen, who arranges a ride home. Both sacrifice convenience and some independence.
Examples: " I'll take you to the movies tonight if you'll do the dishes first..'"This time we'll go to the park and next time well go to the video arcade."
"I cut, you choose."
Examples: Mom lists five places to eat...Dad chooses which one. Big sister lists five games to play...little sister chooses which they play.
IMPROVED COMMUNICATION SECRETS
Listen. . .much family conflict is not over genuine disagreement but miscommunication. Help~
Identify with the other person's point of view.
Talk about needs and feelings, not just position. Position: "I'm going to play golf this weekend." Better: "I know we planned to clean the garage on Saturday, but I've been under so much pressure that I think I 11 explode if I don't get a few hours to myself."
Example: Junior storms in from a baseball game, says his team lost and slams his bedroom door. Action: An immediate reprimand for the slam or cajoling to "make him feel better." Better: Wait for him to process his own feelings. Talk about winning and losing after the storm has passed.
Know when to stop talking. We don't all absorb input at the same rate. Talking at someone is a weapon intended to produce capitulation. Learn to back off, rest, reflect and return to the discussion at another time.
Stick to the issue at hand. Try to avoid an exchange of accusations that rake up the past and predict the future.
Example: Mom: "You could have called. You're so inconsiderate. You've never cared about anyone else, and never will!" Teen: "Why should I? You never believe me anyway!" Better for mom: "It's not like you to be so late. I was worried. What happened?"
Never use physical force. Separate warring children, reinforce positive behavior and find alternatives to physical punishment, even if your parents used it and you "turned out OK" Reason: The message is that it is OK to use force to gain one's point of view. Family-sanctioned violence can lead to confusion between affection and aggression in adulthood.
UNDERSTAND THE REAL ISSUES
Families can argue about almost anything. But often a seemingly trivial squabble is really about a larger, sometimes "hidden," issue. Understanding what conflict is really about can help parents decide the best way to handle it. Underlying issues that commonly trigger family conflict. . .
Individuation and autonomy. "I am me, not you. I am independent"
Separation. "I am anxious that you are leaving me/I am leaving you."
Trust. "I trust/don't trust you to keep your promises, protect yourself from harm, make your own decisions."
Competition over resources. "I want more love, attention, space, time, help, money, privacy, privileges."
Because these issues recur in every person's life, regardless of age or gender, raising a conflict-free family is not possible.
Realistic goal: To evolve a process whereby family members communicate openly, negotiate disagreements, tolerate one another's differences and respect each person's autonomy.
BUIIDING A POSITIVE FAMILY PROCESS
Building a positive process takes time and attention. Helpful:
Take time to talk and listen to others' points of view, when no response or action is expected.
Don't expect to resolve everything all at once...or forever. A problem that appears to be settled today may be back tomorrow.
Example: Establish a regular, pleasurable activity to reinforce a child's competence rather than focusing on arguments over poor schoolwork.
Demonstrate equity. Avoid belittling children's concerns.
Example: Weigh slices of cake rather than brushing off the concern that "her piece is bigger than mine!"
Solve easy issues first. Families get stuck on problems that are complex and intertwined. Better: Find a small area that you can negotiate. Remember The process is as important as the goal.
Example: Mom needs time to herself. Getting Pat a bike helps.
Remember that the family is a system. A change in one place will produce a reaction somewhere else.
Example: Now that Pat has a bike, Mom has freedom, but Jamie feels slighted.
If what you usually do stops working, try something different.-
Baby Hearing Checklist
From birth to three months, the baby should be startled by sudden loud sounds and begin to recognize your voice.
From three to six months, he/she should turn his eyes toward interesting sounds and seem to listen.
From six to 12 months, he should understand simple words like no and bye bye and his own name.
By 12 to 18 months, he should start saying words like da-da, ma-ma and bye bye.
By 18 to 24 months, he should sing, hum and know about 20 words.
If in doubt: Consult your child's physician.
John McElveen, MD, director, Carolina Ear Research Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina.
by Brenda Daley
Over the past two years Montserrat has become a spectacle of natures fury around the world. As we rush towards the second millennium the worlds major stock markets continue to propel upwards to the stratosphere, so does the inescapable evaluative nature of the volcano, which raises a fundamental question for every attempt to discuss the economic viability of my island Montserrat.
The business community is distressed about the nonexistent economy and the future viability of our island. Our historical beautiful and unique attractions, that once gave our economy life and were formerly frequented by pleasure seekers, jet-setters and rock stars have been diminished. Yet we hold on; Montserrat is our home sweet home. My tenacious people wait with hope and prayers in their hearts and a smile of our fondest memories.
I wholeheartedly agree with The Honorable Chief Minister David Brandt that Montserrat is still the richest island in warmth and still well endowed with the worlds most hospitable people. No financial value can be placed on the disappearance of a whole island. We recognize that there remains much room for growth and our goal remains that of becoming a situs for our primary resources: the sons and daughters of our soil.
Now is the time to embrace the positive, grasp our lesson and divorce ourselves from idle talk and negative behavior. Our approach towards our future must be pragmatic.
Gone are the days when only a privileged "handful" of students could leave the island to pursue a degree. Higher education is entering a most propitious yet delicate stage in our history and we must see this time as one of opportunity to forge a greater future and not fall prey to mere blindness. We are visualized by others as having no chance in our country amongst ourselves and against other countries that have more political significance. It is our duty as fellow Montserratians to prove them wrong. Now is the time to set high goals and to sow peace, love, joy, gratefulness, humility, friendship and patience. Our children are now exposed to a different atmosphere.
Montserrat is not at all lost, because our children have a chance to further their education, to gain invaluable work experience in the international arena to make us proud, to one day return equipped and to contribute to the viability of our economy, refreshed with new ideas, technological progress and education that will no doubt transform Montserrat our beautiful Emerald Island of the Caribbean into a major tourist attraction and one of the best financial jurisdictions: a force to be reckoned with.
For those of our precious children who remain at home, parents and teachers should remain vigilant. Love , encourage and nurture them to work to the best of their ability, because they will1 no doubt be the forerunners in the
future development of our island and climb to heights of national prominence.
We must focus on our children. Keep track of their progress. Set-up Sub-committees in what ever island or countries they are in, so we can monitor, praise and reward those students who have excelled despite natures blow against us. As our children recognize the interdependence within Montserrats society, they will perceive that their personal significance can also arise from contributions to our nation. Although Montserrat is now back to its embryonic stage, these are the vital and informative years which should equip us with the basic skills, with rational thinking as the focal point, thus providing a strong foundation for our children to continue in our pursuit of academic excellence and social integration.
<CLEADING 11.5>Arming our children with the revolutionary advances in technology, the changing economic picture for all of higher education will, eventually, bring an enhanced and expanded gleam of light to our beautiful island of Montserrat. It should be our resolution that higher education is a crucial and necessary component in any realistic plan for the future development of our island.
Let us focus on the words of two of our great calypsonians and as we grasp a deeper meaning and understanding to their contributions:
"As we prepare for the 21st century we must not remain crippled mentally in our youths, we must invest, there is no room for special interest so long as we are on the mark. It is time to make a start, the country is ours and only ours.
"With our people our only natural resource, it is our duty to change this course to assume self sufficiency, unity must be the key, sound leadership, vision and authenticity will give rise to a rejuvenated economy. So let this country be a model for all to follow by staying on the straight and narrow."
"We have no industries but our children are young and strong; educate them wisely and inspire them to strive along . Some day they will build industries, factories, business places too. Masters of a science and literature would be is true. Striving towards their goal with love and ambition, rendering their commitment with dedication, oh yes, they will be concentrating on achievements and production.
"MY PEOPLE PLEASE ENCOURAGE THEM TO STRIVE ALONG"
Brenda Daley calls herself A Proud Montserratian."
She taught School at the Dagenham campus, teaching Geography and Art. She currently lives in the Bahamas and works at the Central Bank of the Bahamas Bank on the Supervision Technical Staff, having graduated from the College of the Bahamas in June 1997.
February 2, 1998
UNITED KINGDOM GOVERNMENT's
(Department for International Development)
EMERGENCY HOUSING and INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
by Brown & Root
We would like to take the opportunity to review Brown & Root's (B&R's) projects on Montserrat so that there is public knowledge of the scope of B&R activities and the benefits provided.
Brown & Root Ltd. arrived in Montserrat on 20th July 1997 under contract to the Department for International Development (DFID). The contract to manage the UK 'Immediate Temporary Housing & Shelter' programme called for a flexible and rapid response capability and required consultation with the Government of Montserrat and as much use of local firms and individuals as possible. Responding to the immediate need, whilst being influenced by public opinion and demand, B&R began a programme of semi-permanent (pre-fabricated) and permanent (block work) housing at Davy Hill and Lookout Yard.
B&R's Project Management role is one of procurement, logistics and programming of works. Therefore B&R are responsible for coordinating and supporting the efforts of others in the timely delivery of finished products. B&R are not building contractors. The actual works are contracted almost exclusively to local firms. These local firms are supported by local merchants, local utility companies and other local service providers. Montserrat's heavy plant capacity is supplemented and coordinated for B&R by the Caribbean firm, Edghill Associates Ltd (EAL). EAL are also responsible for constructing the first centralised sewage collection and processing system introduced to Montserrat by B&R.
The following is a progress update of B&R's activities as sponsored by the Aid Management Office on behalf of the United Kingdom Government:
1. Davy Hill. The 50 modular houses were completed in nine weeks (mid August to late October) from first entry of plant onto the green field site. All the houses are occupied and the families are enjoying a new life away from the shelters. Brown & Root Ltd. have been responding to the minor teething problems. There is a programme to upgrade the roads and resolve some plot drainage difficulties once some additional pipe work has been completed to bring the Government's dormitory units on the South side into the central sewage system.
2. Lookout Yard. Fifty (50) permanent blockwork houses are being built by local contractors, George Tuitt, Emmanuel Galloway, Adolphus Weekes, Herman Robinson, Alphonsus Duberry, David Payne, Stedmon Cassell and Phillip Peters. The design was the work of local architect Mr. Alford Dyett. The materials are supplied mainly by local merchants M S Osborne, Galloway Hardware, Romeo's and BBC. Plant, trucks etc. are provided by Wall's Trucking, Eddie's Trucking and PWD. The local utility companies, MONLEC and MWA, are making a vital contribution.
Plant first entered this site in mid September and the first batch of houses began in mid October. The first of these 50 houses was completed recently with the remainder scheduled for completion over the next few weeks. In order to encourage and reward the earliest possible completion of the houses, an incentive scheme has been introduced for the contractors. Naturally, early completion means early occupation!
3. Shinn Lands Housing. A site has been designed and prepared at Shinn lands, (that is to the south of the Brades school/shelter) to develop a minimum of 12 serviced plots to be administered by the Ministry of Agriculture. Five of these plots will accommodate modular houses left over from the Davy Hill project. The houses are to be erected by Joseph Meade. Additionally, an area of land has been set aside for a special needs housing project sponsored by HE the Governor. This area will also have utilities provided. Construction began at the beginning of the year with the five houses now scheduled for completion in March.
4. Caricom Village. This village of some 30 houses is a gift from Caricom. The infrastructure will be put in place by B&R (sponsored by UK Government) and the construction will be carried out by the Jamaican Defence Force, all under the management of PPU Project Officer, Don Juxton-Smith.
An initial concept to locate the Village on a site adjacent to the Davy Hill development was found to be unsuitable as the quantity, type and size of these houses was confirmed. An alternative site has been identified at Lookout Yard.
Secondary benefits of these housing developments have been:
Water Storage. The Montserrat Water Authority was contracted to build a 100,000-gallon water storage tank at Dick Hill to increase the storage capacity at that site to 140,000 gallons. The additional storage capacity not only insures a constant supply to the Lookout housing settlement, (including those houses to follow) and the adjoining school, but also augments the water availability to sections of the northern safe zone, which have been plagued by regular interruptions.
Sewage Collection and Treatment. The sewage networks and treatment plants, whilst introduced to process waste from the 50 houses at Davy Hill and up to 200 houses at Lookout Yard, were designed with sufficient capacity to service further development in these areas. So far, this has included the Government dormitories at Davy Hill, St John's school at Lookout Yard, Caricom Village and liquid waste trucked from shelters. The treatment plants have been the subject of much public debate, which warrants response in a separate bulletin. However, the Montserrat Water Authority, which has been given the responsibility to manage the treatment plants, stated that the waste water from the Davy Hill plant is safe and within the guidelines for effluent discharge into the environment.
School Recreational Area. Excess material from the construction works has been used to reclaim an area behind St John's School, Lookout Yard, for eventual use as a recreational area for the school and/or community.
Other B&R managed projects are:
5. Government Headquarters. Preparations for the temporary Government Headquarters began in December 1997, although construction works officially got underway with a ground breaking on Monday 26th January by the Chief Minister. The offices will consist of 100 flat pack units laid out and partitioned in a configuration designed by K J Cassell, architect, in intense collaboration with the Permanent Secretary Administration, Claudia Roach. The services and foundations are designed to enable future expansion and upgrading of this asset, once vacated by Government.
6. School Improvement. A toilet block has been completed at St John's School, Lookout Yard, to service the 12 additional classrooms and staff facilities already provided by the erection of 38 flat-pack units. Through these and other works, the school is now in a position to operate as Montserrat's only secondary school.
7. SDA Community Centre. The services and facilities at the Seventh Day Adventist centre, Mango Hill, were upgraded and completed to provide extra capacity when it was offered as a emergency shelter during a time of great need in September 1997.
8. Montserrat Volcano Observatory. Living accommodation has been provided for the night duty staff at the new MVO on Mango Hill.
9. Containers. Following major eruptions and the subsequent evacuation of Salem, 47 assorted 20 and 40-foot containers were brought in to provide essential storage capacity.
10. Community Support. B&R have also been happy to contribute to the ongoing efforts to provide community support by sponsoring the 'Music for Montserrat' concert in UK, the Christmas stage and a 'Jump-Up' and a face-lift to the Brades shelters.
It can be seen from the above that there has been and still is a huge amount of work to be conducted with the limited human and material resources available during these difficult times on Montserrat. B&R acknowledge the invaluable support which we have received from the Government of Montserrat, all the agencies and businesses, the utility companies and statutory authorities, contractors and individuals who have all contributed to overcoming the many challenges presented. We ask for your indulgence while we continue to strive to deliver quality products in as short a time as possible.
Leo Bedford
Project Manager
UKOTA in London
Ladies and Gentlemen, we are today considering the future relationship between the United Kingdom Overseas Territories and the United Kingdom.
For most of us, this relationship goes back some 350 years, which in itself demands that it not be taken lightly. We must pay urgent and special attention to the fact that it is universally acknowledged, and has been for many years, that there are aspects of this long standing relationship which need to be changed. So we are gathered here in an effort to address the question, "what rights should United Kingdom Overseas Territories have?"
Let me begin by quoting Jose Trias Monge, a former administrator in Puerto Rico who has already made an important statement that can be applied to our situation.
"The issue should not be whether further powers of self government should be extended to the colonies but rather what powers do the Colonies want to entrust to the former empire ... Nobody has the right to govern another. It is as simple as that."
I agree with this statement in its entirety, particularly as it implies that United Kingdom Overseas Territories must take a far more active role in how our affairs are to be determined.
Further, United Nations Resolution 1541 (V) states clearly that all people have the right to govern themselves and urges the worldwide dismantling of colonialism.
A 1989 Report of the UN Special Committee concludes in this way: "a non-self governing territory should have the right to determine its internal constitution without outside interference, in accordance with due constitutional processes and the freely expressed wishes of the people."
The United Kingdom subscribes to the UN Charter and is aware of its emphasis on the self-determination of all people. We have been assured this morning that the United Kingdom is not fighting to hang on to her remaining United Kingdom Overseas Territories in a relationship of imperial dominance. Indeed the presentation of the Foreign Secretary was encouraging in its commitment to self-determination, and by implication a diminution of dominating power over overseas Territories.
All of us here, I think, have opted to retain ties with the UK. The questions, that concern us are:
What are those ties to be?
What changes are required in the existing relationship? And
How and when will they be put into effect?
The establishment of a new department with a Minister who has responsibility for the Dependent Territories is most welcome, and I would like to express my Delight that Baroness Symmons has been given this responsibility. I would like to point out however, that unless an adequate budget is put in place to support the work of this Minister, this move may not be as beneficial as we might want.
The great challenge, as I see it, is for us to work out a relationship with the UK that will give the United Kingdom Overseas Territories more autonomy and self determination without an immediate severance of ties. This relationship should grow to be more a partnership than a domination. A situation that all parties can be happy with and that will be free of the stigma of colonialism.
The details of such an undertaking are of course beyond the scope of this brief address. Nor can they be the purview of any one country. My purpose is to try to establish guidelines and parameters which can facilitate the huge body of work we all need to do.
No constitution, however well worded or thought out, can ever work well if it is an imposed document. It is my view that the rights, responsibilities and privileges enjoyed by any people should accrue from the mores, folkways, values and political ethos of that group rather than from a perceived tradition or an imposed culture.
The people whom the constitution should serve should play a decisive role in its formulation as it would impact their lives, operate in their culture and is the instrument which regulates their society.
In short, the Constitution should not be a document that is imposed by some foreign sovereign authority. It follows therefore that under the new dispensation, no amendments should be made to any overseas territories constitution without the direct and active involvement of the people concerned.
In the current climate of partnership and mutual respect there can be no reasonable explanation for allowing to remain in place constitutions with clauses which offer varying degrees of power to an overseas territories Governor couched in language such as "in his discretion"? This too has to be viewed as harmful to any people's quest for self-determination.
Further, we are increasingly being reminded that the British Government has, prior to today, no coherent and publicly articulated agenda for its overseas Territories. I have myself sat on many street corners in Montserrat and listened to young men and women seeking to unravel the "British agenda." In fact, the orientation of the United Kingdom has engendered the suspicion that the only plan that exists, as far as Montserrat is concerned, is a plan to totally depopulate the island, as its people continue to struggle to cope with the crisis brought on by an erupting volcano.
It would be remiss of me if I did not at this point discuss the rights of United Kingdom Overseas Territories with respect to Developmental Aid from the UK government. It should be a fundamental tenet of British Government policy that where United Kingdom Overseas Territories are unable through their own resources to finance infrastructural development the Sovereign power should be obligated to provide such support in a timely manner.
This right should not be subject to negotiation or the whims of any particular official. The United Kingdom Overseas Territories should have first unfettered call on British Aid funds, to support their legitimate needs, and this should be an indisputable right.
If such a doctrine had been in operation at the outset of the current volcanic crisis in Montserrat, I am confident that we would not have suffered the fatalities that we did on June 26, 1997. Furthermore the ill will and rancor that pervades the mismanagement of this crisis, even as I speak, would have been prevented by such a doctrine.
I take this opportunity to invite the United Kingdom Overseas Territories Association to send a fact-finding delegation to visit Montserrat to conduct an on the spot assessment of the situation. Such a mission would do much to bring clarity to this situation. Many of us will be close to Montserrat at the Bahamas Conference and it would greatly encourage us if a small team from the DTA could take this opportunity.
I myself have had cause to speculate particularly with respect to the disappointing slowness of HMG in making funding available to meet basic humanitarian needs in Montserrat.
I believe that most persons here are aware of the problems presently confronting Montserrat. Unfortunately, some of the difficulties have been compounded by decisions of some officials. The following example illustrates this dilemma.
Following strong representation by Montserrat, an Aid Management Office was set up in Montserrat. It took time, but eventually a good working relationship was developed.
Suddenly without warning this office was downgraded and all decisions relating to the Montserrat situation reverted to being made in DFID, London by officials who want responsibility for allocating housing. If we do not allow this we were told, future aid would not be approved.
Certainly, it seems logical and prudent for us to use objective criteria for the allocation of housing, but we are being pressured to have this function dictated from London. Let me state here categorically, that notwithstanding our vulnerable condition, we will never be bullied into submission.
But back to the specific issue at hand. A good policy should have clear objectives, and as a bare minimum British policy should seek to accomplish the following:
1. Change the orientation of the British / overseas territories relationship from what rights the British are willing to give us, to what powers we would wish them to have over us.
2. Institute constitutional reforms which allow United Kingdom Overseas Territories to proceed to responsible government, having greater autonomy and involvement in the conduct of their domestic affairs. These reforms should provide for the increased involvement of Ministers in areas of governance expressly reserved for the governor. This will begin the process of securing internal self governance for United Kingdom Overseas Territories through the devolution of executive and administrative power from the Secretary of State and Governor to elected officials through a mechanism entrenched in the constitution. If this necessary step is taken, the process whereby Ministers practice the exercise of responsibilities which could one day be theirs, would finally have been set in motion.
3. Give United Kingdom Overseas Territories the right to interact with, and to receive assistance from states and international organizations without the active intermediation of HMG.
4. Uphold the right of British Citizenship, for those OVERSEAS Territories who request it.
5. Institute greater respect for the individuality and cultural characteristics of the United Kingdom Overseas Territories and their people who should have the right to determine their constitution without interference, in accordance with due constitutional processes and in keeping with their freely expressed wishes;
6. Provide for ongoing assistance to United Kingdom Overseas Territories from HMG for the development of their socio-economic institutions. This should ensure prompt and effective delivery of assistance to OVERSEAS Territories and this entitlement should automatically result in prompt and effective delivery of assistance in times of crisis
7. Discontinue the practice whereby international treaties ratified by Britain are extended to the United Kingdom Overseas Territories without their consent. United Kingdom Overseas Territories should not be saddled with British international obligations which they may not be able to, or wish to fulfill. While the comments made by the Secretary of State are appreciated, it cannot be acceptable that the UK government should have the right to legislate for the overseas territories without their consent.
I believe that, despite the past errors and mishaps, the British Government and its OVERSEAS Territories share a foundation from which to develop constitutional models for the OVERSEAS Territories on the basis of consultation, collaboration and mutual respect. In Conclusion, let us be reminded that we are all on the dawn of a new millennium where we are challenged by the global trend towards greater trade liberalization. Like the rest of the Caribbean, the OVERSEAS Territories have acceded to a Charter of Civil Society and have committed to laying the foundation for a human-centered system of governance that eschews social justice.
Like many other countries of the world, the OVERSEAS Territories are challenged by poverty and the scourge of illegal drugs which threaten the social fabric of our societies. We are however committed to democracy, good governance, respect for human rights, the rule of law and the attainment of the highest possible standard of living for our people. These are responsibilities we take unto ourselves as a people in our various communities. These are responsibilities that we seek nothing more than the very best chance to fulfill.
As we work together to fulfill them, let us be guided by this:
"The issue should not be whether further powers of self government should be extended to the colonies but rather what powers do the United Kingdom Overseas Territories want to entrust to the former empire ... Nobody has the right to govern another. It is as simple as that."
Thank you very much.
Jus wonderin where is the Minister of Communications and Works, when one of his employees reports to work at 8.45 each day and yet has time to prepare sumptuous chicken and meat lunches in the office in time for 12 noon.
Jus wonderin why the doctor, who is paid for call-outs, did not respond to the nurses call to look at the child screaming from pain.
Jus wonderin if the Health Department is checking the merchandise being brought from Plymouth by the big merchant grocery supplier, being supplied to retailers even though the expiry dates are gone. Jus wonderin if it is true that this is done saying to the smaller merchants that the locals do not check expiry dates.
Jus wonderin if so many people would have taken the package if someone had told them that the lump sum money was not as glittering as it appears since they had to pay for every thing they would ever need.
Jus wonderin if the government folks did not think it was their duty to protect their citizens from abuse that many of them now suffer having evacuated.
Jus wondering if the British officials know that there is a massive plan afoot to return 500 Montserratians in six months.
Jus wonderin why so many people have so much to say about how they feel towards the British Government in private, but will not let their voice be heard in public.
Jus wondering which regional official will be the boss Permanent Secretary. Wonder what the union will have to say about it. Wonder if I Man Speaks will get to speaking on the matter.
Jus wonderin why none of the British employed people in Montserrat do not wish to leave.
Jus wondering which British expert is preventing local authorities from sending out housing forms to Montserratians in Antigua and Britain. Wonder if the expert got wind of the plan of returning Montserratians.
Jus wonderin if the lady scientist was really saying that even with the ash in Montserrat the air is safer here than in London and some other places in the world.
Jus wonderin what the outcome will be in the Bill Clinton sex scandal.
Jus wonderin if there is something in the rumor that the eclipse will put out the fire in the belly of the volcano. And still jus wondering which civil servant trying to stop the statutory corporation from distributing their eclipse sun glasses.
Jus' wonderin' ...how de OFFICE for de AID goin' to handle MANAGEMENT by remote control_Jus' wonderin' if dey movin' on up to de Off Shore Comfort Zone since de BOSS sayin' dey MAY have to move out of de local Swimmin' Pool Zone...

Forward all Questions, Comments and Suggestions to: roachb@candw.ag
This site was created by West Computer Works. Please read Disclaimer.